1. Education
Send to a Friend via Email

Discuss in my forum

Andrew Alden

What Churchill Meant

By July 23, 2013

Follow me on:

You know those things that newspapers do, with quotes from 50 or 100 years ago today? Last week the New York Times ran a bit from the 17 July 1913 International Herald Tribune about the geopolitics of petroleum:

Mr. Winston Churchill made an important statement in the House of Commons yesterday on the navy estimates with regard to the future supply of oil for the British navy. He showed how the use of oil as the motive power for warships is rapidly developing, and outlined the policy to be followed by the Admiralty in order to secure adequate oil stores at reasonable prices. One of the most striking points is that the Admiralty will seek to obtain the ownership, or, at any rate, the control of an oil supply at its source. In the British Islands alone, he said, according to the "Daily Express," twice as much oil as the navy used last year could be produced from shale and clay.

Churchill was not speaking of shale oil as we understand it—with slant drilling and hydrofracking and pipelines—but rather of oil shale, a resource that is largely forgotten today. Oil shale is bitumen-soaked mudstone that has not matured into a petroleum source. It was dug up like coal and roasted to distill the liquid hydrocarbons. You can imagine how messy such an industry would be, but battleship fuel was a highly strategic resource. Soon after Churchill's remarks, the British Empire secured large supplies of conventional oil from the Middle East, with consequences that still resonate today. The US government still has an interest in oil shale, but it has been off the front burner, so to speak, for many years.


July 24, 2013 at 9:46 am
(1) Richard Guy says:

I would like to discuss with a Geologist the basic weaknesses in Post Glacial Rebound and the Ice Age Theory. I would like to speak to some forward thinking Geologist who is not caught up in the Rising Seas Media hype and is willing to think freely about the Isostatic Rebound Theory and why it is wrong and needs to be debunked. Geology needs a breath of fresh air and it starts with getting rid of the Rebound theory.’
Richard Guy: email me at richardguy9 at gmail.

[Richard, I've deleted your phone numbers. It's a bad idea to broadcast that kind of information. —Geology Guide]

Leave a Comment

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

©2014 About.com. All rights reserved.