In March's issue of Geology, Walter Alvarez and Henrique Leitão describe this key point of the "Copernican revolution" and urge that geologists claim it as part of their own history. The heliocentric theory that Copernicus is usually lauded for is actually a failurethe sun is not the center of the universe any more than Earth was. But, they point out, "the planetary-Earth concept was correct; there has never been any serious reason since then to think that Earth is not a planet."
Discovery News also published a story based on this paper adding the welcome, long-standing argument by Eldridge Moores that geology should be taught in secondary school as the central basic science. Geology is the historical wellspring of physics and chemistry, not some lesser "applied" branch of those fields. And geology provided the strongest evidence for biological evolution in the years before genetics was well understood; even today fossils are essential to evolutionary research.
Background:
"Earth" versus "the world"
Earth in the 1600s
Geology and evolution


Comments
That sounds like an article I should look up. I have often complained when people say “geocentric is wrong and heliocentric is correct” but have just received scorn. [What system do meteorologists use?] I didn’t realize that the switch from considering the earth to be the center of the universe also transformed it to being a planet among other planets.
jah