Earthquake Lights Lecture Online
There I see the natural and legitimate skepticism of a community faced with a novel hypothesis. I also see the age-old scenario of the physicist versus the geologist, the lab versus the Earth, the blackboard versus the field. That repeated contest has yielded shared victories (Wegener vs the establishment yields plate tectonics) and lopsided routs (geologists vs Lord Kelvin on the age of the Earth). But in this case, everyone in the room has masses of stubborn experimental and observational fact and a bit of funding to take more steps forward.
The p-hole hypothesis
Earthquake lights and brain activity
The strange attraction of UFOs
The Sichuan "earthquake lights" that aren't
Were you there? I'd love to see your comments.


Comments
Dr. Freund wrote me to say, among other things, “From my perspective the presentation went very well. There was a good turn-out. There were people in the audience whose presence really counted. . . . From the USGS side there was a near-complete line-up of “big names” in the earthquake field. . . . What I hope to have achieved with this talk today is to pull the USGS earthquake guys into the picture and prepare them for the hard fact that, in the future, they will have to trade the purchase and installation of yet another dozen or hundred or thousand seismometers for more openness toward non-seismic earthquake and pre-earthquake work to be done by non-seismologists.”