My Catastrophe Beats Yours
Geologists can imagine much worse. In my own neighborhood of Oakland, California, a repeat of the 1868 earthquake on the Hayward fault will cause a couple hundred billion in damage in about a minute. A talk I'm seeing tonighta close look at that quakewill probably turn my hair white; if not, the earthquake itself surely will. And the dreaded next great subduction quake in Cascadia, and the dreaded next great quake in Southern California, would undoubtedly rival it.
But last year I heard seismologist Ross Stein lay out an even direr scenario: a repeat of the 1923 Kanto earthquake, in the Tokyo region, would cost roughly a trillion dollars, something like $250 billion a minute. With its ensuing financial ripples, that would be a global catastrophe, a different order of event from this week's gyrations in virtual money.


Comments
A lot of geological (and human) things can put things in perspective, compared to Wall Street. Although I have to admit to getting old enough to not like seeing IRA’s and 401Ks going downhill - looks like the Baby boom generation may indeed work instead of retire! (And at least ‘they’ aren’t jumping from buildings, yet.)
Are there any uniformitarian disasters out there slowly and steadily creeping up on us?
Maybe the next ice age? Someday? Of course it’s not a disaster if it happens gradually!
Sea-level rise?